������Ƶ

In his provocative new book, War! What Is It Good For?: Conflict and the Progress of Civilization from Primates to Robots, historian Ian Morris turns Edwin Starr’s old song lyric on its head, arguing that war has actually been quite good for some things, namely the states that wage it. Indeed, he shows that, over time, wars have made governments and that governments have made peace, providing their citizens with relative safety, wealth, and larger, more organized societies.
��
By combining the four ways of looking at war — personal, military, technical, and evolutionary — Morris provides a new perspective on human conflict that is lost in most other histories. He notes, for example, that almost every documented society, going all the way back to the world’s first written records, has waged war. If war is really such a bad idea, why is it such an apparently permanent part of the human condition, and can anything alter that fact? Many experts suggest that by the 2040s, wealthy countries will be using fully robotic weapon systems, removing the need to risk human lives on the battlefield at all, in essence putting war “out of business.” But is the computerization of war making the world a safer place? Should a computer with humanlike intelligence be armed?�� ��Are we truly reaching an endgame, as Morris suggests, in which man has become less violent, and a burgeoning “globocop” will make wars unnecessary?
��
The ������Ƶ Foundation welcomed Morris for a discussion about the findings in his book and whether war has actually made society safer and wealthier, and if the future of war will truly be peace.
��
��
Join the conversation online using #MorrisWAR and following @NatSecNAF.��

Participants:

Ian Morris
Author, War! What Is It Good For?: Conflict and the Progress of Civilization from Primates to Robots
Jean and Rebecca Willard Professor of Classics and Professor of History, Stanford University
��

Director, International Security Program, ������Ƶ