Stephen Burd
Senior Writer & Editor, Higher Education
I have written a lot lately about Washington University in St. Louis’s recent efforts . If Wash U. officials want to know more about what it takes for an elite private liberal arts college to excel in this pursuit, they should look no further than Grinnell College in Iowa.
Grinnell has long been committed to enrolling low-income students. Currently, are recipients of Pell Grants, which is the federal government鈥檚 primary source of aid for financially needy students. The college not only welcomes financially needy students but provides them with enough financial and academic support to help them succeed at the school.
Grinnell is in admissions, meaning that it doesn鈥檛 take financial considerations into account when admitting students. It also pledges to of students with grants and a relatively small amount of federal loans.
These policies have for a college that admits such a large share of low-income students, enrolls far fewer 鈥渇ull-pay鈥 students than many of its peers, and generates considerably less in philanthropic support that can be spent on need-based financial aid. Worried that these practices were not sustainable, the college鈥檚 Board of Trustees created a stir on campus when it considered in 2012.
Many colleges, under such financial stress, would likely have reduced the share of low-income students they enroll. Not Grinnell. Instead, the school鈥檚 administrators have bolstered the college鈥檚 financial aid budget, primarily by boosting the number of international students who can pay full freight and strengthening its alumni fundraising efforts, according to , Grinnell鈥檚 dean of admissions and financial aid.
In addition, the college plans to reduce its spending on merit aid. Currently, but have no financial need. 鈥淢erit aid has helped Grinnell both attract highly qualified students and generate revenue for the purpose of underwriting the costs associated with our commitments to diversity and access,鈥 Bagnoli recently told me over email.
鈥淏y building stronger market demand for the tremendous program Grinnell offers, we plan to begin reducing our investment in merit aid without compromise to the academic profile of our student body and without losses to student revenue,鈥 he wrote. 鈥淚t鈥檚 a delicate balance (we cannot too quickly remove merit aid before achieving a more competitive market position) but we are optimistic that we can recover current investments in merit aid while continuing to attract an outstanding and diverse student body.鈥
Pleased with the results of these changes, the board for at least another three years. 鈥淚t鈥檚 been a long climb,鈥 Bagnoli said during a separate interview in November. 鈥淏ut we are increasingly convinced that being need-blind is a critical element of our institutional identity.鈥
Where does Grinnell鈥檚 commitment to socioeconomic diversity come from? Officials there say it is in keeping with . The school was founded in the mid-nineteenth century by social reformers and abolitionists. One of the institution鈥檚 major benefactors — — was a 鈥渃onductor鈥 on the , which helped transport slaves to states in which they could gain their freedom. Nearly a century later, Grinnell alumni, such as , were key architects of Franklin Delano Roosevelt鈥檚 programs.
Today, the college lists 鈥渟ocial responsibility鈥 as . 鈥淭he students we choose to admit are an expression of those commitments,鈥 said Bagnoli.
Grinnell has proven adept at finding low-income students who have the academic qualifications to succeed at the school. In addition to its own recruiting, the college works with outside organizations that identify financially needy students who have the potential to thrive at top schools. For example, the college has partnerships with the following organizations:
The college also twice a year so that they can see and experience the campus for themselves.
Recruiting high-achieving, low-income students will remain a priority at Grinnell, according to its president, .聽鈥淐olleges nationwide recruit high-achieving, low-income students from magnet schools and other special programs that identify talent. That’s good, and we need to do a lot more, including recruiting high-achievers trapped in under-performing schools,鈥 he said. 鈥淩ight now, this country needs all the brainpower we can find. We need leaders with different experiences and points of view. And we don’t think students’ ability to get a first-rate college education and contribute to society should be limited by their family resources.鈥
This post ran first on .”