Improving Transfer in the Age of Free 2-Year College
The vast 聽(80%)聽of community college enrollees say they intend to earn a bachelor鈥檚 degree or more. Doing so is in their financial best interest, too鈥攂achelor’s degree holders, on average, have a earnings premium over associate’s degree holders. Unfortunately, the 6-year bachelor鈥檚 degree attainment rate for these students is notoriously and, for many, the transfer process plays a significant role.
Historically, transfer students have largely been left to their own devices. Even when students do get help on planning to transfer, advising often misses the mark. 鈥淭he general advice that students get who don鈥檛 know what they want to major in is 鈥榊ou can put that off and get your gen eds out of the way,鈥欌 says Dr. Davis Jenkins, Senior Research Scholar at Columbia’s Community College Research Center and one of the authors of last year鈥檚 . Advice like this leads students to accumulate credits haphazardly rather than helping them transfer into a 4-year school with junior standing. Even if students avoid this trap, they still might have a hard time finding the right courses for a seamless transfer. 鈥淚t isn鈥檛 really feasible for community college students鈥攅specially those who are the first in their families to attend college鈥攖o set up a meeting with, say, the dean of business at the local university and ask 鈥榃hat should I take to make sure my credits apply to your program?,鈥欌 says Jenkins.
As free 2-year college programs expand and bring with them increases in community college enrollment, prioritizing transfer will become more urgent. More students will arrive less prepared and requiring more support, and higher enrollments will stretch community college鈥檚 already thin budgets for student supports. There鈥檚 also evidence that free college programs are leading students who otherwise would have enrolled in 4-year institutions to start at 2-year schools instead. For these students, if transfer pathways are poorly designed and implemented, free college may end up doing more harm than good. If states are going to encourage students to start at community colleges, they need to ensure students can successfully transfer out and finish a bachelor鈥檚 degree.
A Closer Look at Tennessee
Tennessee, the state that has led the way in the free college movement, has been working to improve the transfer process even before the arrival of its free college program, TN Promise. In 2010, the state introduced and implemented common course numbering to decrease excess credits and streamline transfer. If a student follows a pathway, they鈥檙e guaranteed the credits will count toward their major at participating 4-year schools. All of Tennessee鈥檚 public schools and most private schools participate. To further improve student outcomes, the Tennessee Board of Regents鈥(TBR) Academic Foci initiative requires every student at TBR schools to enroll in a specific program or broader academic focus area.
Dual admission partnerships further build on this framework. These partnerships鈥攚here students are admitted to both a 2- and 4-year school simultaneously鈥攐ffer students the best of both worlds. Students typically start with courses at a 2-year school*, where they can take advantage of TN Promise and a 2-year school鈥檚 flexibility, while also having access to the 4-year school鈥檚 wraparound services. The idea is that by participating in advising at a 4-year school, students are provided with better information and build a connection with the 4-year school. Then, depending on the program, after 1, 2, or 3 years students start taking courses at the 4-year school without needing to navigate transfer鈥檚 usual set of challenges. Every public community college and 4-year school in the state as well as a few private schools have formed at least one dual admission partnership, even the flagship . Individual institutions have the autonomy to determine what partnerships to build and how they鈥檒l function. Many of these partnerships have been developed recently in response to TN Promise and TBR expects these partnerships to continue to grow.
Although not explicitly designed to ease transfer, at some , students can pursue Promise-eligible 2-year degrees and eliminate transfer altogether. Most of these 2-year degrees are vocationally focused, but several are what many would consider 鈥渢ransfer degrees鈥 such as Austin Peay’s . Students can pursue this degree at Austin Peay and seamlessly move to a bachelor鈥檚 degree once their TN Promise grant is exhausted. 2-year students have access to the same courses and the same faculty advisors as their 4-year peers, but had they declared for a 4-year degree as freshman, they wouldn鈥檛 have received Promise funding. It looks like at least some students are taking notice. Austin Peay has seen a very significant in new enrollments in their 2-year programs, although the university doesn鈥檛 attribute it entirely to TN Promise.
These are good first steps, but they aren鈥檛 perfect. Creating transfer pathways and requiring students to choose a major or academic focus aren’t enough on their own. Advising is still crucial for the success of transfer students, so institutions have to allocate the staff and funds necessary to meet each student鈥檚 needs鈥攁 challenge in its own right.
Geography can be limiting, too. Not every pathway is offered at every community college, nor does every community college partner with every 4-year school. For dual admission, depending on the distance between campuses, students might not be able to reasonably access the resources of a 4-year school. For example, while Northeast State Community College has dual admission partnerships, students are probably much less likely to take advantage of campus resources at the University of Memphis, almost 500 miles away, than at East Tennessee State, under 20 miles away.
From a cost saving perspective, it鈥檚 unclear how much students will actually save by starting at community college. Depending on how institutional aid is allocated at 4-year schools, students could see some of those savings go away since 鈥攊ncluding transfer students鈥攇enerally receive less generous financial aid. Also, TN Promise won鈥檛 foot the bill for any courses dual admission students take at 4-year schools, even while pursuing their 2-year degrees. Going the route of a 2-year degree at a 4-year school comes with its own cost challenges: students pursuing these routes only receive an award up to the average cost of tuition and fees at community colleges in the state, which may not fully cover tuition**. Students also live on campus just like bachelor鈥檚 degree seekers, adding to the college experience but also driving up costs, so it isn鈥檛 a fit for every student.
Looking Ahead
Tennessee’s 4-year schools have been concerned about shrinking freshman enrollments and have taken to . But going forward, rather than competing for the same freshman, schools (and policymakers) need to realize that embracing transfer students helps schools fulfill their missions and makes business sense. Dr. Jenkins of CCRC explains 鈥淏y working with community colleges to strengthen transfer pathways for students who start in 2-year colleges, 4-year schools can build a supply of directed and well-prepared students鈥攎any of whom would never have come to them directly. They can thus broaden their market and increase enrollment.鈥
Schools in Tennessee should consider partnerships that meet students where they are rather than requiring students to come to them. Some 4-year schools in Tennessee already offer bachelor鈥檚 degrees at a few 2-year campuses, but this could be expanded. Tennessee could also go a step further and allow community colleges to award bachelor鈥檚 degrees independently, although this brings its own . Another solution could be allowing students to use Promise awards for 2-years of their bachelor鈥檚 degree at any institution, eliminating the 2-year degree step for those who aren鈥檛 interested in that credential. Ultimately, to reach every student Tennessee needs a blend of these strategies paired with high quality advising that starts in high school.
Tennessee鈥檚 existing policies should help the first cohort of TN Promise recipients hoping to transfer do so smoothly, but there鈥檚 no guarantee these improvements can handle the increased enrollment TN Promise has created. At this point, data on transfer rates for students intending to earn bachelor鈥檚 degrees isn鈥檛 currently available in the state, but is something policymakers will want to keep an eye on. And if Tennessee wants to stay at the head of the free college class, it will need to continue working on improving transfer.
* Some partnerships allow students to take courses at the 4-year institution as well.
** has lowered its tuition and fees to be fully covered by TN Promise.