Aaron Loewenberg
Senior Policy Analyst, Early & Elementary Education
国产视频鈥檚 Early & Elementary Education Policy team recently released聽. This comprehensive report ranks states on 65 policy indicators in seven policy areas that promote strong literacy skills by the end of third grade. States are grouped into one of three categories — crawling, toddling, or walking — across all seven policy areas combined and within each individual policy area.
It should come as no surprise that one policy area we focus on is the specific nature of each state鈥檚 third grade reading law. Due to the growing evidence highlighting the importance of achieving reading proficiency by the end of third grade,聽聽have passed legislation aimed at improving third grade reading and providing targeted interventions for students struggling to reach proficiency.
The importance of achieving reading proficiency by the end of third grade is hard to overstate. Recent聽聽suggests that students who do not achieve proficiency by the end of third grade are four times less likely to graduate from high school on time than their proficient classmates. And if a non-proficient third grader lives in a family that is poor for at least a year then they are six and a half times less likely to graduate on time. While there is always hope that a struggling reader will eventually catch up, the聽聽suggests that interventions for struggling readers after third grade are rarely as effective as those that take place in the early years. With statistics like these, it鈥檚 no wonder why organizations such as聽聽have focused so much of their efforts on ensuring that more students meet grade-level reading benchmarks by the end of third grade.
Our report evaluates states鈥 third grade reading laws on eight criteria (listed below). States with reading laws should require annual reading assessments for students in kindergarten through third grade in order to assist school staff in tracking the reading progress of each individual student from year to year. Ideally, state law would require literacy assessments to be administered even before students begin kindergarten. When we say 鈥渁ssessment鈥 here, we don鈥檛 mean subjecting pre-K students to rigorous, time-intensive tests, but rather utilizing聽聽to capture essential early literacy skills such as letter recognition.
These kinds of early literacy assessments allow teachers to identify struggling students early on and intervene before the students get too far behind. And because early literacy intervention is so important, it鈥檚 imperative that state reading laws require intervention聽产别蹿辞谤别听the third grade so that struggling readers have plenty of time to catch up. It鈥檚 also important that parents are kept informed about their child鈥檚 reading progress so that they鈥檙e able to engage in appropriate reading activities at home to help improve their child鈥檚 reading skills.
Several states with third grade reading laws require that students who are not reading proficiently by the third grade be retained for another year. The thinking is that struggling readers should have the benefit of another year of third grade to improve before they are promoted to fourth grade where content across the subject areas becomes more complex. Our report actually penalizes states whose laws require retention. Why is this? suggest that being retained is associated with later negative impacts, such as a higher likelihood of dropping out of high school. Retention is also for local education agencies. Because of the negative social and financial impacts of grade retention, we penalize states whose reading laws require retention but also reward states that allow for exemptions from grade retention.
State policies concerning聽聽vary significantly across the country. In fact, 14 states have no third grade reading law on the books at all. These states were not rated in this policy area. On the other end of the spectrum, the map below shows the six states that stand out due to their promising third grade reading law: New York, Virginia, Minnesota, Texas, Utah, and Colorado. New York is the only state that earns the maximum amount of points possible in this policy area. Of the states that do have a third grade reading law in effect, 17 states are 鈥渨alking鈥 toward a strong third grade reading law, nine states and DC are 鈥渢oddling,鈥 and ten states are 鈥渃rawling.鈥 Again, it should be pointed out that 14 states have no state reading law on the books at all.
With only one state meeting all of our indicators for a strong third grade reading law, most states with these laws have a lot of work to do in order to strengthen the law that is currently on the books. This is important and necessary work, but having a specific third grade reading law isn鈥檛 the only way to go about it. Some states without reading laws on the books right now are still heavily engaged in work to improve children鈥檚 literacy outcomes. In the coming weeks, we鈥檒l highlight one of these states.”