Stephen Burd
Senior Writer & Editor, Higher Education
Will Sen. Chris Dodd once again stand in the way of a vital reform proposal that aims to prevent students from taking on unnecessary private loan debt? We will find out next week when the Senate takes up to overhaul the nation鈥檚 financial regulatory system.
At issue is a proposal that is included in the that would require colleges to certify a student鈥檚 need for private loans before that individual could receive them. The plan aims to give college financial aid administrators the opportunity to counsel students before they take out expensive private student loans. This is important because, , nearly two-thirds of undergraduates who borrow private loans do so even though they haven鈥檛 exhausted their eligibility for lower-cost federal student loans first. One quarter of these private loan borrowers do not take out any federal loans at all.
The Senate bill does not include this provision. So far, Dodd has resisted . Instead, he continues to support a toothless alternative measure he helped push through Congress in 2008.
At the time, students were from direct-to-consumer private student loan companies that were promising them easy-to-obtain loans of up to $50,000 a year. The ads did not mention that private loans lack the fixed rates, consumer protections, and flexible repayment options of federal student loans. Even worse, many of these companies , by stressing how much easier it was to obtain a private loan than a federal one.
Alarmed by these practices, the House included a provision in the Higher Education Act reauthorization legislation it was considering that would have required schools to certify all private student loans. The lawmakers were hoping to build off effort by schools like and , which through their counseling efforts had been extremely successful in discouraging students from taking on excessive amounts of private loan debt.
Under heavy lobbying pressure from direct-to-consumer private loan providers, Dodd, the chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, stood side-by-side with the ranking Republican on his panel, Sen. Richard Shelby of Alabama, in opposing the provision.
Instead, Dodd forged a compromise — which was ultimately included in the final reauthorization bill — that simply required students seeking private loans to 鈥渟elf-certify鈥 that they were aware of their federal student loan options.
At Higher Ed Watch, . We held out hope, however, that the Federal Reserve Board, in drafting rules to carry out this provision, would require students applying for private loans to obtain the self-certification forms from their college financial aid offices. This would have at least given colleges some opportunity to provide counseling to their students.
Unfortunately, the completely undercut the purpose of the law by allowing lenders to provide students with pre-filled self-certification forms that they could simply sign and send back. In other words, direct-to-consumer private loan providers can continue to circumvent the schools.
Over the last year, more and more evidence has emerged about just how misguided this regulation is. , the country鈥檚 largest private student loan provider, school certification reduces the amount of private loans students borrow 30 percent of the time. Meanwhile Moody鈥檚 Investor Services has reported that than uncertified private loans do. For example, that First Marblehead鈥檚 direct-to-consumer loans were approximately three times more likely to default than private loans the company distributed that were certified by colleges.
Luckily, with the financial regulatory overhaul bill, Congress has a second shot to get this right. Hopefully, Senator Dodd won鈥檛 make the same mistake again.