Lisa Guernsey
Senior Director, Birth to 12th Grade Policy; Co-Founder and Director, Learning Sciences Exchange
There are at least 10 actions the federal government can take to improve early education without rewriting laws or requiring a large infusion of new funding, according to a released Friday from the Center for American Progress (CAP). Among them: partnering with states to create common early learning standards, improving coordination and consistency in federally funded technical assistance programs, and requiring districts or schools to expand children鈥檚 participation in early learning programs to turnaround failing elementary schools.
The report, 鈥淚ncreasing the Effectiveness and Efficiency of Existing Public Investments in Early Childhood Education,鈥 was written by Donna Cooper, a senior fellow on CAP鈥檚 economic policy team, and Kristina Costa, research assistant for CAP鈥檚 Doing What Works program. To gather ideas, Cooper and Costa drew on the expertise of a committee of 19 early childhood researchers and policy specialists that met several times over the past year. (I participated on behalf of the Early Education Initiative here at the 国产视频 Foundation.)
While the report acknowledges that 鈥渁dditional federal and state financing is needed鈥 to ensure that a greater number of children have access to good early learning programs, the committee was charged with recommending how to improve the quality of what is currently funded without relying on Congress or new funding streams.
The report highlights 10 areas that can be strengthened or reformed by officials in the U.S. Department of Education and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services:
1. Partner with states to align early learning standards that define expectations for all early learning programs
2. Invest with states to build assessments and assessment systems that demonstrate standards are being met
3. Increase consistency, quality, and systemwide access to federally procured and federally required, locally procure technical assistance
4. Implement a more consistent, state-of-the-art approach to high-quality professional development for existing staff and help determine the optimal set of skills and knowledge that should be imparted in preparation programs for early childhood program staff
5. Improve early childhood data and harmonize reporting requirements to help increase knowledge of inputs and outcomes
6. Promote the replication of successful strategies to build continuity from early childhood programs to kindergarten and continue to remove data and other bureaucratic barriers to successful continuity systems
7. Build more federal, state, and local capacity to meet the increasing demand for culturally and linguistically appropriate services for children who are dual-language learners
8. Close the gaps in universal developmental screening across all federally supported early learning or care programs
9. Require expanded early learning program participation as a means of boosting performance of failing elementary schools
10. Establish a permanent office that creates a common infrastructure to advance system reforms for both the Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Education
We could write a blog post on each of the above bullet points, but let鈥檚 zoom in on one that doesn鈥檛 get as much attention in the early childhood world as we think it should: the point that early childhood investments should be a big part of turning around failing elementary schools.
The report calls on the Department of Education to advance efforts to 鈥渋ncrease the percentage of incoming kindergarten students that have participated in high-quality early childhood programs鈥 and increase 鈥渢he availability of full-day kindergarten.鈥
In multiple studies, these two interventions have been associated with learning gains for children that can be sustained, building on each other throughout a child鈥檚 years of school. For example, researchers studying the Chicago Parent-Child Centers 鈥 a program originally designed to extend from pre-k through 3rd grade, with explicit inclusion of full-day kindergarten 鈥 have found that participation in the program is connected with a person鈥檚 success in life 25 years later. are legion, and that children who attend full-day programs have more success in literacy and math skills compared to counterparts who only attend for half the day. And yet pre-K programs and , if considered at all, in education reform efforts.
As we鈥檝e noted in our issue brief on 12 Ideas for the 112th Congress, and in a previous blog post and recent podcast, the U.S. Department of Education鈥檚 efforts to turnaround schools is missing this emphasis on access to high-quality pre-K and full-day kindergarten. Expansion of early learning programs is described as being encouraged or permitted, but not required.
The CAP report鈥檚 recommendation strengthens the call: The U.S. Department of Education should require that school improvement strategies at the elementary level 鈥渋nclude efforts to increase enrollment of the incoming kindergarten class in high quality early childhood programs and full-day kindergarten.鈥
We hope that officials at the department who oversee the School Improvement Grant program will take heed.
P.S. For more resources on building alignment between pre-K, kindergarten and the early grades of elementary school, see our ever-growing Before Birth & Up Through Third Grade resource page.