Chayenne Polim茅dio
Fellow, Political Reform Program
Religion is everywhere in America: from the Declaration of Independence, to George Washington’s Farewell Address, to Ten Commandments monuments on display in public buildings, to politicians discussing their religious beliefs on the campaign trail, to today鈥檚 ever-raging 鈥渃ulture wars.鈥
But while the idea of religion is still extremely powerful, ubiquitous, and intertwined with conceptions of what it means to be American, the reality of the role religion plays in American society is changing: The percentage of Americans who identify as religious has been on a consistent decline, and the 鈥渘ones鈥濃攖hose who are religiously unaffiliated鈥攎ake up of the American population.
This decline in religiosity has meant that . That鈥檚 worrying鈥not because people should necessarily believe in God, but because Americans鈥 atrophying church attendance means that one of the oldest spaces where Americans have been able to to engage with other members of their community, and even fight for various causes, doesn鈥檛 have the same resonance it once did.
Churches are an example of what urban sociologist calls a 鈥渢hird place.鈥 Third places are spaces where people spend time between their first and second places鈥攈ome and work, respectively. Third places serve as . This means that they鈥檙e locations where, in the case of churches, people can share their worries, rejoice, and renew together.
But beyond the more obvious, easily identified, and more religion-oriented roles churches play, their existence serves a vital, and arguably inimitable, social and civic function.
Similar to unions, local chapters of political parties, and alumni associations, churches are civic institutions, albeit not directly linked to government or governance issues. They鈥檙e forums where individuals feel safe and able to share their problems with their broader communities. Churches also have long been spaces where members of minority groups have gathered and felt welcomed. During the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s, for instance, African-American churches played innumerable as safe havens and organizing hubs. This isn鈥檛 to say, of course, that churches haven鈥檛 also been used to exclude some of these same minority groups, particularly when it comes to same-sex relationships and so-called 鈥渞eligious liberty鈥 laws. Today, however, many religious places have steadily transformed into areas where refugees, immigrants, and LGBTQ groups have been able to find compassion, not to mention financial and spiritual help.
But as , churches are forced to adapt to a new reality. Take Chicago, where the Roman Catholic Archdiocese will be . There鈥檚 also Baltimore, where Govans Presbyterian Church and Brown Memorial Woodbrook Presbyterian Church will before the end of the year, in an attempt to manage stagnating attendance, rising costs, and a shrinking 聽population of Christians to draw from.
That matters, or at least it ought to. Churches, as third places, provide a relaxed and 鈥渓ow-stakes鈥 atmosphere, and they foster trust between members of communities鈥攁nd in the public institutions so fundamental to a . Political science scholars have long bemoaned the consequences聽 have on the health of a democracy. Alexis de Tocqueville, one of the greatest scholars of American democracy, that religion, as a political institution and voluntary civic association, was key to the preservation of freedom in a democratic society.
That鈥檚 because voluntary civic associations, by virtue of bringing people together, can cultivate trust among individuals and create 鈥渃ivic capital.鈥 to David Davenport, of the Hoover Institute, and Hanna Skandera, former secretary of education of New Mexico, 鈥渃ivic associations can serve as a kind of buffer or intermediary between individuals and public institutions. They provide citizens with an opportunity to give freely and generously, beyond both the obligations of law and the market鈥檚 narrower interest in profit.鈥
To be clear, the decline in churchgoing doesn鈥檛 mean that Americans are becoming 鈥渨orse鈥 people. In fact, a of Americans say that it鈥檚 not necessary to believe in God to be moral. What鈥檚 more, this isn鈥檛 a phenomenon unique to the United States; rather, the is happening in many other places across the planet. Yet American society, especially, seems to be struggling to establish other institutions that might fill the same 鈥渃ivic space鈥 that churches have historically occupied. Or in other words, no other institution today appears to have same clout that churches do鈥攐r used to.
So is there any hope for reviving the church鈥檚 function as a third place?
While the Internet and social media are usually praised for their ability to connect people, and while they鈥檝e seen a not-insignificant amount of success when it comes to organizing, . It can, all too often, and fuel isolation. As Rabbi David Wolpe , 鈥淭he decline in attendance at churches and synagogues is sad for those of us who care for religion, of course. But it is also sad to see the waning of one of the last great institutions that brings people together. Yes, the synagogue is full of problems and politics, but that is just another way of saying it is full of people.鈥
Efforts to reinvigorate neighborhoods鈥攖o break down social siloes by taking 鈥攈ave included everything from promoting as a tool to develop public infrastructure, to ensuring in residential areas. And still other efforts propose , which might increase diversity and community cohesion, though mixed-income neighborhoods 听诲颈惫别谤蝉颈迟测.
Hickman that policymakers can foster the growth and maintenance of third places if they 鈥渆nsure that neighborhoods are well lit so that residents can visit third places after dark; provide support to local groups (in the form of subsidized rents and advice) to encourage them to occupy empty retail units; ensure that recreational areas are well maintained and managed; and support community centers.鈥
Whether these kinds of efforts will truly be enough to make up for the diminishing civic role that churches play in American communities remains to be seen. As third places, churches fulfill important social and civic functions, providing a sense of community and belonging, as opposed to self-segregated enclaves. In these times of dizzyingly deep division, American communities could surely benefit from more spaces like that.